Benchmarks — New Zealand

Programmatic Display benchmarks for New Zealand

Every published Programmatic Display figure Adkeen holds for New Zealand, each with its source, methodology, caveats and position on the validation ladder.

At a glance

  • CTR — 0.00%
  • CPC — USD 0.81
  • CPM — USD 6.00
  • Invalid Traffic — 0.01%
  • Viewability — 0.62%

Last verified 2026-08-26

How these grades work →

Programmatic Display · New Zealand

CTR

Public baseline — awaiting practitioner validationStep 1 of 5 on the validation ladder

Directional — modeled, not measured · Grade D

Modeled planning estimate, synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research and platform documentation over time, not a single named vendor. Use for planning and diagnostics; replace with account trailing benchmark when available.

0.00%

Evidence gap

This benchmark needs more evidence to be reliable

Evidence grade D · confidence Low-Medium. Practitioner data is what moves it up the ladder.

Period

2026

Evidence grade

D

Confidence

Low-Medium

Comparability

Medium

Source

Adkeen Benchmark Synthesis

Last verified

2026-08-26

What this means

Share of impressions that produced a click. A relevance signal, not an outcome.

Methodology

Planning values synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research, platform documentation and market cost data gathered over time, normalised into a single per-market, per-channel planning set in USD. Not a single named vendor or proprietary panel. No credible public dataset provides every metric for every channel across all 11 markets — this is stated directly in the underlying methodology. Genuinely missing combinations are shown as such, not estimated.

Programmatic Display · New Zealand

CPC

Public baseline — awaiting practitioner validationStep 1 of 5 on the validation ladder

Directional — modeled, not measured · Grade D

Modeled planning estimate, synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research and platform documentation over time, not a single named vendor. Use for planning and diagnostics; replace with account trailing benchmark when available.

USD 0.81

All figures are in US dollars (USD) across every market.

Evidence gap

This benchmark needs more evidence to be reliable

Evidence grade D · confidence Low-Medium. Practitioner data is what moves it up the ladder.

Period

2026

Evidence grade

D

Confidence

Low-Medium

Comparability

Medium

Source

Adkeen Benchmark Synthesis

Last verified

2026-08-26

What this means

What one click costs on average. Rising CPC usually means auction pressure, not worse creative.

Methodology

Planning values synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research, platform documentation and market cost data gathered over time, normalised into a single per-market, per-channel planning set in USD. Not a single named vendor or proprietary panel. No credible public dataset provides every metric for every channel across all 11 markets — this is stated directly in the underlying methodology. Genuinely missing combinations are shown as such, not estimated.

Programmatic Display · New Zealand

CPM

Public baseline — awaiting practitioner validationStep 1 of 5 on the validation ladder

Directional — modeled, not measured · Grade D

Modeled planning estimate, synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research and platform documentation over time, not a single named vendor. Use for planning and diagnostics; replace with account trailing benchmark when available.

USD 6.00

All figures are in US dollars (USD) across every market.

Evidence gap

This benchmark needs more evidence to be reliable

Evidence grade D · confidence Low-Medium. Practitioner data is what moves it up the ladder.

Period

2026

Evidence grade

D

Confidence

Low-Medium

Comparability

Medium

Source

Adkeen Benchmark Synthesis

Last verified

2026-08-26

What this means

Cost to reach a thousand impressions. It prices attention supply, not campaign quality.

Methodology

Planning values synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research, platform documentation and market cost data gathered over time, normalised into a single per-market, per-channel planning set in USD. Not a single named vendor or proprietary panel. No credible public dataset provides every metric for every channel across all 11 markets — this is stated directly in the underlying methodology. Genuinely missing combinations are shown as such, not estimated.

Programmatic Display · New Zealand

Invalid Traffic

Public baseline — awaiting practitioner validationStep 1 of 5 on the validation ladder

Directional — modeled, not measured · Grade D

Modeled planning estimate, synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research and platform documentation over time, not a single named vendor. Use for planning and diagnostics; replace with account trailing benchmark when available.

0.01%

Evidence gap

This benchmark needs more evidence to be reliable

Evidence grade D · confidence Low-Medium. Practitioner data is what moves it up the ladder.

Period

2026

Evidence grade

D

Confidence

Low-Medium

Comparability

Medium

Source

Adkeen Benchmark Synthesis

Last verified

2026-08-26

What this means

Share of traffic judged non-human or non-legitimate. Treat it as a supply-hygiene warning light.

Methodology

Planning values synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research, platform documentation and market cost data gathered over time, normalised into a single per-market, per-channel planning set in USD. Not a single named vendor or proprietary panel. No credible public dataset provides every metric for every channel across all 11 markets — this is stated directly in the underlying methodology. Genuinely missing combinations are shown as such, not estimated.

Programmatic Display · New Zealand

Viewability

Public baseline — awaiting practitioner validationStep 1 of 5 on the validation ladder

Directional — modeled, not measured · Grade D

Modeled planning estimate, synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research and platform documentation over time, not a single named vendor. Use for planning and diagnostics; replace with account trailing benchmark when available.

0.62%

Evidence gap

This benchmark needs more evidence to be reliable

Evidence grade D · confidence Low-Medium. Practitioner data is what moves it up the ladder.

Period

2026

Evidence grade

D

Confidence

Low-Medium

Comparability

Medium

Source

Adkeen Benchmark Synthesis

Last verified

2026-08-26

What this means

Share of impressions that actually had a chance to be seen. A media-quality measure, not performance.

Methodology

Planning values synthesised from aggregated public benchmark research, platform documentation and market cost data gathered over time, normalised into a single per-market, per-channel planning set in USD. Not a single named vendor or proprietary panel. No credible public dataset provides every metric for every channel across all 11 markets — this is stated directly in the underlying methodology. Genuinely missing combinations are shown as such, not estimated.

Other channels in New Zealand

Programmatic Display in other markets